Comments on: What Linux Distribution Fits Your Lifestyle? https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/ Daily tips, tricks, and news about Linux and Linux-related software. Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:08:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: dan https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-79 Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:40:55 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-79 simply mepis 04:04 have run mepis for a year or more I run this because it's easy,quick, does what I need it to do & I am no GURU, just a normal user, not into games. I run no M$ @ all simply mepis 04:04
have run mepis for a year or more
I run this because it’s easy,quick, does what I need it to do & I am no GURU, just a normal user, not into games. I run no M$ @ all

]]>
by: Paul https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-74 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:23:23 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-74 Greetings, I headed up development for College Linux for a bit, but as of a month ago have since left to pursue other projects. The development of the distro has changed greatly allowing for the community to be in control of distro based decisions. Development version 2.6 is nearing an end and you should see a public 2.7 release in about a month or so. My personal project is a cross between slackware and gentoo. If you took the stability of slackware, slack package management, added some more BSD-like configs and also made it source based by option, you have Marcus Linux. Couple this new system with an easy and intuitive graphical installer, and I think it'd be a winning combination. Greetings,
I headed up development for College Linux for a bit, but as of a month ago have since left to pursue other projects. The development of the distro has changed greatly allowing for the community to be in control of distro based decisions. Development version 2.6 is nearing an end and you should see a public 2.7 release in about a month or so.

My personal project is a cross between slackware and gentoo. If you took the stability of slackware, slack package management, added some more BSD-like configs and also made it source based by option, you have Marcus Linux. Couple this new system with an easy and intuitive graphical installer, and I think it’d be a winning combination.

]]>
by: jon https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-73 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:38:52 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-73 I downloaded and installed Simply-MEPIS the last night and so far I am very happy with it. I replaced a Fedora Core 3 install on my main home PC. FC3 was ok but I was having ongoing problems with nvidia driver, xorg, and my video card. I also am getting tired of upgrading FC every few months. I tend to customize it to the point that I have to wipe and reinstall instead of upgrading in place. The MEPIS install was very smooth. They include qparted so I was able to easily adjust partitions on my two hard disks without loosing my save partition or my Win2000 partition. The 2004.06 rev of Simply-MEPIS is also synced with debian unstable except for the kernel. This means that after the install all you have to do is apt-get synaptic and then go to town installing from the deb repositories. There are thousands of software packages available. The first things I installed were FireFox and Thunderbird. They installed without a hitch. It is essentially an extremely easy way to install Debian. (Much, much easier then Debian itself.) The MEPIS folks also do a very good job of configuring your hardware and your multimedia programs. They also seem to have spent some of time polishing things up as the desktop, fonts, etc all look pretty good and sound and accelerated graphics worked with no fooling around. I downloaded and installed Simply-MEPIS the last night and so far I am very happy with it. I replaced a Fedora Core 3 install on my main home PC.

FC3 was ok but I was having ongoing problems with nvidia driver, xorg, and my video card. I also am getting tired of upgrading FC every few months. I tend to customize it to the point that I have to wipe and reinstall instead of upgrading in place.

The MEPIS install was very smooth. They include qparted so I was able to easily adjust partitions on my two hard disks without loosing my save partition or my Win2000 partition. The 2004.06 rev of Simply-MEPIS is also synced with debian unstable except for the kernel. This means that after the install all you have to do is apt-get synaptic and then go to town installing from the deb repositories. There are thousands of software packages available. The first things I installed were FireFox and Thunderbird. They installed without a hitch. It is essentially an extremely easy way to install Debian. (Much, much easier then Debian itself.) The MEPIS folks also do a very good job of configuring your hardware and your multimedia programs. They also seem to have spent some of time polishing things up as the desktop, fonts, etc all look pretty good and sound and accelerated graphics worked with no fooling around.

]]>
by: Gino https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-72 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:59:00 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-72 For the desktop Mandrake, Mandrake, Mandrake. I have tried so many distros DESPERATELY trying to get away from Windows and I could never do it... But for almost half a year I have been using an OS that makes windows look difficult. Mandrakes urpmi (autoupdate) along with its commitment to open source make it a clear winner for me. If you use it you HAVE to configure your urpmi through http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/. Again I tried so hard to switch to linux with other distros and could never do it.... Suse was slooow, Red Hat had no default package manager that was usefull, Slack, Debian great for servers but come on... Mandrake won me over I am so gratefull that I get to go home and no longer boot into windows. Also cedega for gaming is amazing For the desktop Mandrake, Mandrake, Mandrake. I have tried so many distros DESPERATELY trying to get away from Windows and I could never do it… But for almost half a year I have been using an OS that makes windows look difficult. Mandrakes urpmi (autoupdate) along with its commitment to open source make it a clear winner for me. If you use it you HAVE to configure your urpmi through http://easyurpmi.zarb.org/.

Again I tried so hard to switch to linux with other distros and could never do it…. Suse was slooow, Red Hat had no default package manager that was usefull, Slack, Debian great for servers but come on… Mandrake won me over I am so gratefull that I get to go home and no longer boot into windows.

Also cedega for gaming is amazing

]]>
by: James Dixon https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-71 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:05:15 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-71 College Linux is a derivative of Slackware, as is VectorLinux. Mepis is a Debian derivative, and is great for those that would like to try Debian but can't handle their installer. Personally, I use Slackware. College Linux is a derivative of Slackware, as is VectorLinux. Mepis is a Debian derivative, and is great for those that would like to try Debian but can’t handle their installer. Personally, I use Slackware.

]]>
by: desipenguin https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-70 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:10:56 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-70 SimplyMepis 2004.4 SimplyMepis 2004.4

]]>
by: Clete R. Blackwell 2 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-69 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:01:55 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-69 Sorry, I haven't actually tried Slackware before. Thanks for filling me in on that. (of course, I have heard of it, just have not tried it) On your point of being scared by text, I am sure that many people who are new to computers would. Granted, not many of them are attempting to install Linux, but maybe some were referred by a friend and challenged to it. As for Slackware, I am downloading the ISOs right now so that I can test it out on VMWare or on this "awesome" 233MHz laptop, which has been so abused, I am surprised it works (minus a bunch of things wrong and the screen has a lot of lines going down it on the right). If you say that, after answering some questions about your system, Slackware runs greater than others. I would have said that for Debian, as it has specialized packages for the architectures. Another distribution that I forgot to mention was College Linux, which is (or was, not sure if it still is) a 1CD distribution geared at college students. Simple installer with not too many options to fool around with (this isn't neccesarily a bad thing, but it has probably changed). Gets the job done. Sorry, I haven’t actually tried Slackware before. Thanks for filling me in on that. (of course, I have heard of it, just have not tried it)

On your point of being scared by text, I am sure that many people who are new to computers would. Granted, not many of them are attempting to install Linux, but maybe some were referred by a friend and challenged to it.

As for Slackware, I am downloading the ISOs right now so that I can test it out on VMWare or on this “awesome” 233MHz laptop, which has been so abused, I am surprised it works (minus a bunch of things wrong and the screen has a lot of lines going down it on the right).

If you say that, after answering some questions about your system, Slackware runs greater than others. I would have said that for Debian, as it has specialized packages for the architectures.

Another distribution that I forgot to mention was College Linux, which is (or was, not sure if it still is) a 1CD distribution geared at college students. Simple installer with not too many options to fool around with (this isn’t neccesarily a bad thing, but it has probably changed). Gets the job done.

]]>
by: Cypress https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-68 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:48:09 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-68 Hey, what about Slackware? One of the fastest distros out there. Hey, what about Slackware? One of the fastest distros out there.

]]>
by: Joe Ferrare https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-67 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:26:33 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-67 Slackware? You left out the other big distro out there, which is too bad. Slackware holds the middle ground between the automatic distros like Suse, etc., and the complete DIY distros like Gentoo. It gives you just enough hand-holding to make it easy to install (really), without encumbering the system with things that slow it down. So for most computers running most programs, it seems as fast as something like Gentoo while not requiring you to compile a thing. On the other hand, if you can answer some basic questions about your system and desires, it's not really any harder to install than something like Suse. You just can't be scared by text instead of pretty graphics. I've got Slackware on my desktop and Gentoo on my laptop (AMD64) and have tried a ton of others. Slackware hits the sweet spot for someone who wants to actually control what goes on with their computer without having to know enough to compile everything, pick a system logger, etc. Slackware? You left out the other big distro out there, which is too bad. Slackware holds the middle ground between the automatic distros like Suse, etc., and the complete DIY distros like Gentoo. It gives you just enough hand-holding to make it easy to install (really), without encumbering the system with things that slow it down. So for most computers running most programs, it seems as fast as something like Gentoo while not requiring you to compile a thing. On the other hand, if you can answer some basic questions about your system and desires, it’s not really any harder to install than something like Suse. You just can’t be scared by text instead of pretty graphics. I’ve got Slackware on my desktop and Gentoo on my laptop (AMD64) and have tried a ton of others. Slackware hits the sweet spot for someone who wants to actually control what goes on with their computer without having to know enough to compile everything, pick a system logger, etc.

]]>
by: Stomfi https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-66 Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:14:06 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-66 The distro with the most drivers, whether OSS or binary. The distro with the most drivers, whether OSS or binary.

]]>
by: Heuristic Blog https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-63 Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:24:58 +0000 https://linux-blogger.com/2005/01/04/what-distribution-is-best-for-you/#comment-63 <strong>Happy Slacker</strong> Today mostly consisted of basking in front of my CRT monitor. This is at least an efficient way of getting a tan waiting for the sun that's scheduled to come out again around April time. (I'm serious; the sun totally disappears in the U.K. during win... Happy Slacker
Today mostly consisted of basking in front of my CRT monitor. This is at least an efficient way of getting a tan waiting for the sun that’s scheduled to come out again around April time. (I’m serious; the sun totally disappears in the U.K. during win…

]]>